Thursday, May 29, 2008

New FHA Loans not as great as they appear!

This article was written by Donna Robinson. I found it so informative that I wanted to share it. It's a real eye opener about how the proposed FHA Loan program will work. It's well worth the read!

Well, the new FHA expansion bill appears to be rocketing through
congress with virtually no opposition.

I got my email from NAR last week, (several times in fact) asking
me to make sure that I contacted my congressional representatives
to request passage of this bill.

NAHB is in strong support of the measure, saying that it will help
stablize the housing market. In fact, if you read the mainstream
media, you would get the impression that this bill has no
opposition anywhere. You may even think that this idea will be
beneficial for you if you are an agent or broker who is suffering
under the strain of the present slump in retail sales.

However, there is a HUGE downside to this bill. The problem is not
in wanting to help people and stabilize the largest single asset
class in America. That is a noble goal, but the means to achieve
the end simply do not add up.

In my opinion, and that of most other real estate market analysts, this expansion of FHA will not solve the subprime problem. It will simply move it from the banks and professional capital investors and instead place it squarely in the laps of the American taxpayers, as subprime lending practices move from the world of capital investors to the world of government guaranteed loans.

Most folks don't realize what "government guaranteed loans" actually are.

Under FHA the taxpayer actually guarantees the mortgage payoff.
When a home that has an FHA loan on it gets foreclosed on, the
lender does not lose their money, as happened with the recent
subprime losses that wiped out some investors and investment
companies. When an FHA loan gets foreclosed, the government
actually reimburses the lender for the balance of the mortgage
note. Meaning - the lender gets paid off by Uncle Sam and HUD
becomes the proud owner of a foreclosed home.

Ever wonder where all those HUD houses come from? They are homes
with government guaranteed loans that were foreclosed. Now Uncle
Sam is the proud owner. Problem is, Uncle Sam is using taxpayer
dollars to provide these guarantees. Then HUD tries to resell the
home and recover it's expenses. When HUD homes sell at a loss, it
is you and I that foot the bill. The real loser in this scenario is
the same hard working American taxpayer that the government claims to be helping.

Expanding FHA to allow for higher Loan To Value limits, "no
downpayment" loans, and adding easier condo financing is tantamount to moving subprime lending from the little known corners of capital investing, and secondary mortgage markets, into the living rooms and pocket books of middle America.

"No Downpayment" and "High LTV Loan Amounts" are considered
"subprime" for a reason. That reason is their tendency to produce
much higher default rates. Well duh...that is exactly what has
happened to subprime.

Higher default rates caused by relaxed lending standards
have nearly led to a world economic crisis.
It makes absolutely no sense to me to throw good money
after bad. Especially when the taxpayers are the ultimate source
for these loan guarantees.

Everyone in Washington wants to be seen as doing something to "fix"
this problem. "Broadening" and in effect lowering FHA's lending
standards will fix things alright. In my opinion, this idea is a
violation of every common sense rule for smart investing. I predict
that this program will only move FHA into the subprime lending
business, and set the US (and the US housing market) up for an even
bigger financial disaster in the future.

Below is a list of the highlights of the new FHA expansion act.
Where would the US economy be today if these items had already been
in place prior to 2005? What if they had been enacted prior to the
collapse of the current housing market? With condos overbuilt in
many cities, and home values falling like rocks, and a few million more
properties with no equity and 40 year payoffs, where the heck would
the US economy be right now?

The only reason we survived the current storm is the fact that the
Federal Reserve injected money into the system to help keep it
afloat. We came very close to a 1929 style crisis. It was narrowly
averted. The average taxpayer does not realize that next time, it
will be their money that will be paying back these loans. It really
makes me wonder what our government leaders are wait I know what they are thinking..."get me re-elected", that's what they are thinking.

Meanwhile, next time you pass a HUD house, or show one to a
prospective buyer, take pride in knowing that you own a small piece
of it. And now, you'll get the chance to buy even more...say,
doesn't that make us all real estate moguls? I'll bet you didn't
even know you owned so many houses already! If you are a working
taxpayer in America you can start bragging about your extensive
real estate portfolio.

FHA Expansion Act Includes The Following Items:

1- There won't be a minimum 3% down payment which
means you need less cash at closing.

2- New 40-year loans will lower your monthly payment.

3- The FHA loan amounts can be higher which
means more homes would qualify for financing.

4- Condos will be more easily insured with an FHA loan.

5- You don't have to have perfect credit.

6- More seniors will be able to get reverse mortgages.

None of the measures being added to the expansion act has any basis
in common sense financial principles. Only a return to solid
fundamental financial principles will save our housing market and
stabilize it over the long run.

We have to realize that there are no quick fixes for poor financial
management. It's high time that our leaders realized that you cannot
solve financial problems by creating more debt.

You may disguise the problem, but you won't get
rid of it. But this time, they have me really worried. This bill is
cleverly disguised as help for homeowners, but in reality it is you
and I who are behind the mask.